Steam loco variations

What's the reasoning behind all the variations steam locos had with their lead and trailing trucks. (ie 2-6-2, 4-6-2, 2-6-4) I understand about the number of drivers and the need for power and traction, and that lead and trail trucks helped guide the loco but why the differences? If more axles on a truck is better, why not go with 2 or 3 instead of 1 axle? It shouldn't have added that much weight, should it?

And why would one railroad but several versions of the same "base model?" For example, ATSF had 2-8-2 Mikados and 4-8-4 Northerns. Is it because that's what the manufacturer had in production?

Just trying to expand my knowledge, which will eventually lead to an expanded inventory. Thanks!
 

roryglasgow

Active Member
Jun 3, 2001
1,223
0
36
55
Huntsville, TX USA
web.wt.net
LONG ANSWER: (see below for short answer)

The pilot trucks served to help guide the driving axles and keep the locomotive from derailing (especially on rough track and tight turns) and support the front end of the locomotive. Trailing trucks were usually added to designs to allow for a larger boiler and/or firebox. The exact number of pilot and trailing axles was determined by how much power the engine could produce and where the driving axles needed to be placed for the best traction. A well balanced locomotive design typically had the driving wheels near the middle, with enough pilot and trailing axles (if any) to support the remaining weight and keep the engine from derailing.

As I understand it, pilot trucks made it a little more difficult to cross the points on switches. Yard engines typically had no pilot or trailing axles. (Although some mainline engines were retired to yard service.)

Locomotive manufacturers were constantly trying to figure out how to make better locomotives. As technology improved, and railroads became more widespread and specialized, builders produced a wider variety of locomotives to fit their customer's specific needs. For example, Shays and Climaxes are really good at pulling heavy loads over poor track along steep grades; but 4-8-4 Northern and 2-8-2 Mikado locomotives are better for fast freight service on good mainline roads.

A general rule of thumb is that in order to make a steam locomotive more powerful, you have to give it a bigger boiler (or boilers). Technological advances like superheating and better firebox designs improved engine efficiency, but there was always a need for something bigger and better. Builders tended to create new designs out of older ones, establishing a logical progression. For example:

4-4-0 American - start here...
4-6-0 Ten Wheeler - bigger boiler, added extra drive axle to get more power
2-6-0 Mogul - Added extra drive axle to get better traction for steep grades and curves, took away extra pilot truck (engine wasn't much bigger overall)
2-8-0 Consolidation - Improvement over 0-8-0 with more power than typical 2-6-0 and 4-6-0 designs.
2-8-2 Mikado - Bigger firebox than 2-8-0, more powerful.
4-8-4 Northern - Huge engine with even more power than a 2-8-2.
...and so on.

(Manufacturers couldn't just jump to a larger engine size without figuring out first how to feed it enough fuel and keep enough steam coming to make the engine effective. Later technological improvements allowed for bigger engines...)

So a railroad might go to a manufacturer and say, "We need a locomotive than can do such-and-such, and nothing exists that can do it." The manufacturer might then build a new model based on an old design (extend the boiler, add a drive axle, add extra pilot wheels and trailing axles to support the weight) and sell it to the requesting railroad. The new design then usually got named after the first railroad to request/buy it. Other railroads usually bought a particular design, too, if it fulfilled a need. ATSF most likely bought a lot of Mikados because it fulfilled their specific needs for power vs. cost over certain parts of their system. Other railroads that ran over different terrain and/or had different practices for moving freight bought other designs that suited their purposes better.

And, one wheel configuration used by one railroad might differ from another railroad's due to modifications made to suit their specific needs. (A 2-8-0 owned by one railroad might differ slighly than a 2-8-0 used by another.)

Keep in mind, too, that long haul freight trains often had several locomotives involved with getting the train from point A to point B. For example, a train that left a city in the flatlands might be pulled by an engine that was good at running fast on relatively flat track. When it got to the mountains, an engine that was more appropriate for mountain travel might be coupled on or replace the other locomotive.


SHORT ANSWER:

It all came down to adhesion and how fast they wanted to move...

-Rory

(Sorry for the long reply!)
 

Drew1125

Active Member
Jan 28, 2001
2,975
0
36
Just thought I'd point out that the Nashville, Chatanooga, & St. Louis (a.k.a. The Dixie Line) had 4-8-4's too, but a RR that ran through the heart of the Confederacy would never stoop to calling one of it's locomotives a "Northern"! :eek:
They called 'em Dixies! :D
 

Bill Stone

Member
Apr 20, 2001
528
0
16
90
San Dimas, California, USA
Visit site
Great info up there.

I would add that my understanding of the prime reason steam switchers did not have lead or trailing trucks was to give them the shortest wheel base possible, so they might be able to fit on a turntable (or a short spur) along with a car or dead loco they were moving. The extreme, of course, was switchers without tenders.

Also, many early interurban steam locos, and logging locos had trailing trucks intended to lead them when running in reverse, as they seldom had the luxury of being turned, and ran in reverse with trains as much as forward.

Bill
 

Gary Pfeil

Active Member
May 7, 2001
2,510
0
36
Boonton NJ
Visit site
I think the primary reason switchers did not have lead and trailing trucks is that they had no need for them, considering the slow speeds st which they worked. Also, this kept 100% of the weight on drive wheels, improving tractive effort.

Gary
 

jimmybeersa

Member
May 14, 2001
508
0
16
92
Alberton . South Africa
Steam loco site

Rory
Thats a great steam loco site thanks! Will be of gereral interrest I am sure. The Gauge is such a fantastic medium for
finding out about all things on railroading, just pose a question and someone will come up with an answer, sure keeps this old brain of mine ticking over

Jimmy