Double Crossover issues

SteveInBama

New Member
Jan 19, 2007
18
0
1
67
Madison/Huntsville AL
I'm in the building process and would like to use a double crossover with a DCC remote control for the two parallel lines I plan to run. I'm new and may be in over my head -- I'd apprecate tips or references on:

A. Should I use a double crossover OR combinations of L and R turnouts?

B. What brand is most reliable and trouble free?

C. What are the rail compatibility issues to watch for ? (Atlas code 100?)

D. What are the issues I'm likely to overlook with my inexperience?

( One engine will be a KATO SD40-2 DCC)

Thanks for any help or references.

SteveInBama
 

steamhead

Active Member
Apr 16, 2005
2,360
0
36
75
Brownsville, TX
Hi...I would go with a commercial pre-fabricated unit. I believe Peco and Shinoara offer these crossovers, and they should be "plug and play"...(meaning no additional wiring required)- just add your favorite switch machines.
Word of caution: Be sure to "gang-wire" the switch machines so they all are properly aligned at the same time and you don't go barreling into a turnout that is improperly set...Good luck..!!
 

nkp174

Active Member
Oct 10, 2006
1,455
0
36
41
Cincinnati, O.
I'd go with Peco if you have any concerns. Shinohara & Micro Engineering are excellent as well.

When Steamhead said gang wiring, he meant that they are wired to the same switch contol so that they all flip simultaneously to avoid accidents. As the railroads say, Safety First!
 

Santa Fe Jack

Member
Jul 20, 2006
253
0
16
63
Lost Almost, New Mexico
I've got a Walthers Shinohara code 83 double cross-over on my layout, and have had no problems whatsoever with entire trains tracking through it. It's a lovely piece, if a bit pricey. Even a showpiece of the layout.

And steamhead's right: If you wire all four switch machines together, the crossover requires only one switch for operations, and it works in either the straight-through configuration, or the X crossover configuration. You'd never need any other option, when you think about it.
 

MasonJar

It's not rocket surgery
Oct 31, 2002
5,362
0
36
Ottawa, Canada
Visit site
The only drawback with the "all-in-ones" versus a x-over made from 4 turnouts (or handlaid!) is that there is no flexibility in geometery. So if the spacing between the Peco main lines (for example) is not what you want, there is no way to adjust it.

Andrew
 

Dansco

Member
Feb 26, 2007
101
0
16
57
adding to masonJars comments..
stretch out the double crossover a few feet and you have an operating passing siding.
 

steamhead

Active Member
Apr 16, 2005
2,360
0
36
75
Brownsville, TX
I agree that making one out of 4 turnouts may give you greater flexibility, but there's still that crossing you have to contend with which would have to match the geometry of your turnouts....Hmmmm...After trying to scratchbuild a simple crossing, I prefer off-the-shelf stuff when it comes to intricate trackwork.
 

SteveInBama

New Member
Jan 19, 2007
18
0
1
67
Madison/Huntsville AL
Thanks y'all, good stuff for me to know about before I stumble into problems. I likely will go with a designed unit (Peco Shinohara or Micro)

Do you have any hints on track compatability/ codes, remotes or any on-line references/"how to" links?

Ain't technology grand - free answers in a flash!
 

MasonJar

It's not rocket surgery
Oct 31, 2002
5,362
0
36
Ottawa, Canada
Visit site
Do you have any hints on track compatability/ codes, remotes or any on-line references/"how to" links?

Almost any track can be used with any other - it's just a question of how much you want to fiddle. Higher-end turnouts can work more easily with flextrack.

Example:
On my modules, I will be using Code83 Walthers/Shinohara turnouts with Code83 Atlas Flex track. The Atlas Code100 rail joiners hold it together securely (although the joints will eventually be soldered). There will be some shimming (minor) under the turnouts, as the Atlas ties are thicker than the W/S ones.


Andrew
 

steamhead

Active Member
Apr 16, 2005
2,360
0
36
75
Brownsville, TX
If you're already using code 100, stick with it. If you're just starting out, whatever code best suits your interests...
I've used Code 100 all my life..So I stuck with it for the new layout. Just make sure if you're mixing brands that the railheads are even, like Andrew notes above.
 

Russ Bellinis

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
4,501
0
36
78
Lakewood, Ca.
Visit site
One thing to keep in moind if you have your layout block wired for dc rather than set up for dcc. All 4 turnouts in a double crossover are wired together so the polarity will be the same through every track in the crossover at all times. If you are wanting to have two mains in opposite polarity, with a double crossover allowing you to move a train from one main to the other and change the polarity accordingly, or use them as a passing siding to allow meets, you will need to cut some gaps in any of the commercial double crossovers.
 

Triplex

Active Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,719
0
36
38
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
I agree that making one out of 4 turnouts may give you greater flexibility, but there's still that crossing you have to contend with which would have to match the geometry of your turnouts....
And the crossing won't fit between mainline tracks of typical spacing if you use separate commercial components.
 

mentor63

New Member
Jan 29, 2008
59
0
6
Colorado Springs, CO
THis is a very helpful thread for me. I am using double crossovers on the DCC layout I am building and was wondering the best way to control them. The idea of simply controlling all four turnouts with one switch and the logic that they can be wired so that all four turnouts go straight or they all diverge had not occurred to me. Brilliant!

I was wondering if I could take that a step further. Is there any reason why I could not wire them all to a HARE, put a senser on each approaching track and use the HARE Auto-Throw feature to insure the turnouts go straight if there is an approaching train? I would want to be able to manualling (switch or DCC) control them also. Any thoughts?

Keep flying with the eagles!

Mentor63
 

SteveInBama

New Member
Jan 19, 2007
18
0
1
67
Madison/Huntsville AL
Response to Mentor63-- Sounds like a good alternative but I'm too new to know. Perhaps some of the experienced guys will know/ reply.

Another Question--
- My search for a U.S. vendor of Peco double crossover source (available) has not been successful... is it ok to ID potential store sources on here?
 

steamhead

Active Member
Apr 16, 2005
2,360
0
36
75
Brownsville, TX
Hi...I searched the Peco catalog...and, NO..they don't make one...:cry:
Have you looked into Shinohara...? There may also be "specialty" manufacturers out there which are not widely known...
 

mentor63

New Member
Jan 29, 2008
59
0
6
Colorado Springs, CO
Maybe I missed something earlier in the thread, but I am using the currect Walthers "DCC friendly" double crossovers. They require a lot of straight space (about 20"), but, so far, I have had no problems with them. Is it availability that is the problem? I know they tend to be out of stock a lot. They list for $59.98, but I have found them for considerably less.
 

Santa Fe Jack

Member
Jul 20, 2006
253
0
16
63
Lost Almost, New Mexico
They indeed can be hard to find. I once sold two of them for $75 each.

The Shinohara double corossover is a lovely piece, and has operated flawlessly on my layout, connecting two main lines. I did cut the outside rails in the middle so that I could block the four corners to separate blocks. It works like a charm.