Search results

Well, since there are only 2 that I know of, I'm going to hedge my bets and say the answer is no. Besides, anything you'd be buying would be so new / underdeveloped you may as well start up from scratch, IMHO.

Gil, If it matters, repost at PM - I am fairly certain nobody will delete, since none of us remember or admit to deleting any first such posting. Also aren't we breaking zealot rules by mentioning the existence of other paper model sites, or some such nonsense? Dan

Looking great! Still following even if I don't comment all the time ;)

Still coming along very nicely!

x2 on both comments ;)

Very nice.

Interesting model. I look forward to seeing how it comes together.

Very nice build!

Incredible detail. Thanks for sharing your build and the instructions of how you do it ;)

would somebody be able to send me the Nimitz - email is my alias @comcast.net. Thanks

Looks great - this is one of the threads that I keep a close eye on as I love how this giant ship is coming together ;)

AltaVista - Babel Fish Translation Here's the translator that I use for German and doesn't require download. There's one for Polish too - www.poltran.com I think - but it's hit or miss if it works for me anyway.

Looks like a very good start! Thanks for sharing ;)

Excellent looking rails and thanks for the tutorial. This is a great build ;)

Looking great as always! I look forward to seeing how you do railings - it's one of the things that scares me from buying too many ship models ;)

Ah, that's a different story altogether...

Good start on the frames! And a sister that'll buy you porn AND card models - it's just too bad she's related then ;)

I printed on 67 lb. white 'cover stock'. That equates to approximately 180g/m2 card from what I can tell on conversion sites (Paper Weight - Conversion Chart). That is what I built my GeeBee on and checks out to be the same thickness (~0.2mm) as the printed kits I've purchased (Halinski and...

Looks really nice!

Great job so far! I wish my work could be half as clean as your supposed 'innaccurate' work ;)