Star Trek Danube-class Runabout “Rubicon”

Revell-Fan

Co-Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Aug 1, 2009
11,595
12,338
228
Vreden
The original is the hand-drawn one by Ninjatoes:
http://ninjatoes.wordpress.com/2003/09/05/star-trek-danube-class-runabout-rubicon/

It was redrawn and cleaned up several times by different artists, including our dear friend Paragon. Apparently the best version is a beefed-up-hyper-dyper-splendid-over-the-top-top-notch-holy-frakkin'-awesome revision by Paul McCool:
http://ninjatoes.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/star-trek-deep-space-nine-rubicon-runabout-by-paul-mccool/

The latest "incarnation" is an excellent 1:200 version by Thunderchild (available here in the Resource section; it even features the roll bar!!!).

:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RoscoVW

zathros

*****SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR*****
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Apr 5, 2013
13,499
9,551
228
Figured I'd post a pic of it. :)

Rubicon.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoscoVW

Revell-Fan

Co-Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Aug 1, 2009
11,595
12,338
228
Vreden
This is the McCool version which is based on NJ's version.
 

Revell-Fan

Co-Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Aug 1, 2009
11,595
12,338
228
Vreden
GREAT! I'm looking forward to seeing it! :)

As for the roll bar, just assemble the small version and the McCool version and do some measuring (length, width, heigth). Determine the scaling factor to make sure that it fits on the big one (dimensions of the big one / dimensions of the small one = scaling factor). :)
 

SylvanKnight

New Member
Oct 19, 2014
17
2
0
60
The planar parts of it look great, but the bussard collector could benefit from a little curving.
 

RoscoVW

New Member
Oct 4, 2008
7
3
1
The planar parts of it look great, but the bussard collector could benefit from a little curving.

You're right, the squared-off Bussards are indeed a compromise. It was necessary given the medium, and the shape of the original part, as a flattened sphere that transitions into a rectangle. If you have a suggestion for how to achieve a more prototypical shape, I'd be happy to look at it.

P. McCool
 

Revell-Fan

Co-Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Aug 1, 2009
11,595
12,338
228
Vreden
You're right, the squared-off Bussards are indeed a compromise. It was necessary given the medium, and the shape of the original part, as a flattened sphere that transitions into a rectangle. If you have a suggestion for how to achieve a more prototypical shape, I'd be happy to look at it.

P. McCool
Thanks. I like that description, very much.

Wait a minute - are you the one who turned NJ's version into that beauty?
 

zathros

*****SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR*****
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Apr 5, 2013
13,499
9,551
228
This is where forming a part with two part Epoxy, then softening some blister pack to pull over would give you excellent results, and not be very difficult. This method has been show many times on this forum. :)